The Uprising ending explained: its own distributors fought over whether Andrew Garfield just became Robin Hood
Paul Greengrass made a film about the Peasants' Revolt of 1381. Two weeks before release, the studio selling it in America and the company selling it in Britain couldn't agree on who the hero was.
The Uprising opened in the US on September 10, 2026, and in the UK on October 9, and for most of its running time it's exactly what its British distributor promised: a muddy, handheld history of England's 1381 rebellion, starring Andrew Garfield as a nameless rebel called the Ploughman. The argument is over the final few minutes. Focus Features built its American campaign around them, Entertainment Film Distributors put out a statement disowning them, and Greengrass says the clue was in his working title all along.
The marketing fight
Garfield's character spent a year billed as "Ploughman," the leader of a rebellion against King Richard II. Then, on August 24, the film's social accounts posted a clip with a new tagline, "Witness the Rise of Robin Hood," TheWrap reported. Focus's own site now described the film as "set against the true events of the Uprising that helped inspire the legend of Robin Hood," and two days later a Dolby poster repeated the Robin Hood line.
The UK company answered in public. Entertainment Film Distributors told Metro that The Uprising is
"…a historical epic about the Peasants' Revolt of 1381, not Robin Hood."
— Entertainment Film Distributors, the film's UK distributor, to Metro
The company added that its UK campaign made no reference to Robin Hood at all. Neither distributor responded to TheWrap's request for comment, and the confusion ran right up to release.
Greengrass took Focus's side. He told The Hollywood Reporter it was Focus's idea "to entice people with the idea that there's something more than they think, and there is," and that he'd been "a bit unfairly criticised for the marketing," per Cover Media. He also pointed to the film's history: when Deadline first reported the project in 2022, with Benedict Cumberbatch attached, its working title was The Hood. It became The Rage with Matthew McConaughey before landing with Garfield as The Uprising.
"It had the outlaw ending, so it was always there."
— Paul Greengrass, on why he called it The Hood, to The Hollywood Reporter
How The Uprising ends
The bulk of the film is history. A ploughman kills a soldier, and the killing sparks peasant revolts across England, led by him, Wat Tyler (Cosmo Jarvis) and the priest John Ball (Jamie Bell). The boy king Richard II (Woody Norman) meets the rebels and promises clemency. Then he has Tyler killed, and his forces slaughter most of the rebels, per the film's Wikipedia plot summary).

The epilogue jumps a year ahead, as Slate's Nadira Goffe describes it:
- The ambush: The Ploughman, now dressed in green, hooded and masked, blocks the king's road in a forest while his outlaw band takes down the royal guards.
- The duel: He fights the lead guard to the death and comes close to killing Richard himself.
- The choice: He pulls back. "Kill a king, there's always another," he tells him, and forces the king to accept a new arrangement: "We rule ourselves now."
That's the whole Robin Hood case. Nobody says the name, and there's no Sherwood, no Sheriff of Nottingham, no Marian and no archery. Greengrass told IGN the ending means "the flame of freedom stays alive, and the hero's journey continues."
Don't miss: 'Then why make a Call of Duty movie?': gamers respond to a director who doesn't want shootouts
So is he Robin Hood?
The film's best clue is the one nobody put on a poster. The earliest known literary mention of Robin Hood comes in Piers Plowman, William Langland's poem from roughly the same era as the revolt, Slate notes. Garfield's character has no name beyond "the Ploughman."
Greengrass didn't need to call him Robin Hood. He named his hero after the poem where Robin Hood first shows up.
Greengrass's own production notes put it more simply: "The original Hood was a simple man, an outlaw." Read that way, the epilogue isn't a twist bolted onto a history film. It's an origin story suggesting the legend grew out of the men who survived 1381.
What the fight cost
The marketing didn't rescue the box office. The Uprising opened to $3.3 million in the US, eighth for the weekend, and has grossed $8.2 million against a $20 million budget. Critics landed at 57% on Rotten Tomatoes and audiences gave it a B– CinemaScore, with the Robin Hood epilogue among the complaints.
Both distributors were selling something true. Focus sold the epilogue, and Entertainment Film Distributors sold everything before it. Neither found many buyers.
Previously we wrote: The Oscars can reward humans all they want. AI will come for Marvel movies first